Something for the geek inside us all
I got this from a friend recently. She had issues with it because she felt that "and" implied addition rather than multiplication. I pointed out to her that in binary mathematics, the "and" operation was equivalent to multiplication. She accused me of being a bigger geek than her.
What can I say? It's an occupational hazard of designing digital logic for a living for the past 20 years.
Anyway, I hope you enjoy this as much as I did. And thanks to foorider for explaining to me how to post an image. (Hey, I design hardware, not software!)
I got this from a friend recently. She had issues with it because she felt that "and" implied addition rather than multiplication. I pointed out to her that in binary mathematics, the "and" operation was equivalent to multiplication. She accused me of being a bigger geek than her.
What can I say? It's an occupational hazard of designing digital logic for a living for the past 20 years.
Anyway, I hope you enjoy this as much as I did. And thanks to foorider for explaining to me how to post an image. (Hey, I design hardware, not software!)
2 Comments:
I have looked over your figure and find your proof eminently logical.
Erm... figures, that is.
Post a Comment
<< Home